They would win the lawsuit because they are entitled to theyre own opinion and should never have been fired for it in the first place. so ive narrowed it down to the top 2 because i know for a fact the company wont win and they were fired without due process and number two is not in the constitution so it is the first one .
the employees will win because the constitution prevents them from being fired without due process.
Shape profit orientations, agenda set, and amount of hard news offered.
Most of the time the important news is not given due prominence by preference on issues that can generate more profit, this causes the vision of society to change, and that we do not become more capitalist and thus observing in many moments only what generates the most. Profit is less what effect matters to society.
When the news of a celebrity buying new clothing is more important than the disasters that have happened in china, for example.
Answer: El entorno de una empresa está compuesto por factores que cambian ... El entorno externo de una organización son aquellos factores externos a la empresa que afectan la capacidad ... Se describe cómo cambian los entornos internos y externos de una ... El análisis de los competidores es un aspecto crítico de este paso.
Explanation:
When Jesus reached the famous well at Shechem and asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, she replied full of surprise: "Jews do not associate with Samaritans” (John 4:9). In the ancient world, relations between Jews and Samaritans were indeed strained. Josephus reports a number of unpleasant events: Samaritans harass Jewish pilgrims traveling through Samaria between Galilee and Judea, Samaritans scatter human bones in the Jerusalem sanctuary, and Jews in turn burn down Samaritan villages. The very notion of “the good Samaritan” (Luke 10:25-37) only makes sense in a context in which Samaritans were viewed with suspicion and hostility by Jews in and around Jerusalem.
It is difficult to know when the enmity first arose in history—or for that matter, when Jews and Samaritans started seeing themselves (and each other) as separate communities. For at least some Jews during the Second Temple period, 2Kgs 17:24-41 may have explained Samaritan identity: they were descendants of pagan tribes settled by the Assyrians in the former <span>northern kingdom </span>of Israel, the region where most Samaritans live even today. But texts like this may not actually get us any closer to understanding the Samaritans’ historical origins.
The Samaritans, for their part, did not accept any scriptural texts beyond the Pentateuch. Scholars have known for a long time about an ancient and distinctly Samaritan version of the Pentateuch—which has been an important source for textual criticism of the Bible for centuries. In fact, a major indication for a growing Samaritan self-awareness in antiquity was the insertion of "typically Samaritan" additions into this version of the Pentateuch, such as a Decalogue commandment to build an altar on Mount Gerizim, which Samaritans viewed as the sole “place of blessing” (see also Deut 11:29, Deut 27:12). They fiercely rejected Jerusalem—which is not mentioned by name in the Pentateuch—and all Jerusalem-related traditions and institutions such as kingship and messianic eschatology.
