<span>Though the United State Supreme court annulled the Georgian law that prohibited non native Americans to be present in cherokee territory (native American Land), the decisions was not enforced and had little impact at that time. The decision didn't carry order of enforcement and even president Andrew Jackson and Governor Glimer didn’t abide by the decision. Worcester felt that the decision is refused by the state itself and it didn't impact in protecting broad legal rights of the Indians. Within 3 years, the cherokee nation was forced west of Mississippi river on “Trials of Tears”.<span>
</span></span>
It could be argued that a political orientation that favors social progress by reform and changing laws rather than by revolution is called "liberalism," although it should be noted that some extreme liberals can be in favor of revolution as well.
Although you did not provide the scenarios, the answer would have to deal with African-americans not being granted citizenship even though they were freed, naturalized, or born within the US. Any African-American that would be denied would be a breach of the 14th amendment.
Answer:
"Getting" the pride/freedom/glory and "keeping" their views of the African Americans.
