1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Readme [11.4K]
3 years ago
9

stephen stigler determined in 1977 that the speed of light is 299,710.5 km/sec. in 1882, albert michelson is there enough eviden

ce to show that michelson's data is different from stigler's value of the speed of light? test at 5% level
Physics
1 answer:
Zarrin [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: hi your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question

answer :

  • population parameter( μ ) : mean speed of light measured by Albert Michelson
  • null hypothesis ( H₀ ) : μ = 299,710.5km/s.
  • Alternate hypothesis ( Hₐ ) : μ ≠ 299,710.5 km/sec
  • Random variable :  Speed of light measured by Albert Michelson.

Explanation:

Using the information provided in the question attached I will match each term with its corresponding meaning

  • population parameter( μ ) : mean speed of light measured by Albert Michelson, here the parameter of interest is the speed of light measured/recorded by Albert which is represented as population mean μ
  • null hypothesis ( H₀ ) : μ = 299,710.5km/s. given that the test is to determine if the speed of light recorded by both scientists are the same
  • Alternate hypothesis ( Hₐ ) : μ ≠ 299,710.5 km/sec. given that the test is to determine if the speed of light recorded by both scientists are the same
  • Random variable ( x ) : Speed of light measured by Albert Michelson. her we are trying to bring to conclusion data measured by Albert Michelson

You might be interested in
Can a constant magnetic field set into motion an electron initially at rest? Explain your answer.
Vinvika [58]

No,  a constant magnetic field cannot set an electron initially at rest into motion

A force that accelerates a particle is necessary to change its velocity. The magnetic force is inversely proportional to the particle's speed. There cannot be a magnetic force acting on a moving particle, according to Einstein. A flux is a precise description of the greater-than-unity magnetic determine involving energy currents and magnet resources. The magnetic flux in a stage is actually selected apart from each some sort of route and also a degree (or durability); therefore, it is just a vector industry. The magnetic flux is usually defined as the Lorentz force that acts on moving galvanic costs.

To know more about Lorentz force refer to brainly.com/question/15552911

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
You charge a parallel-plate capacitor, remove it from the battery, and prevent the wires connected to the plates from touching e
Degger [83]

Answer:

i) C decreases

ii) Q remains constant

iii) E remains constant

iv) ΔV increases

Explanation:

i)

We know, capacitance is given by:

C=\frac{\epsilon_0.A}{d}

\therefore C\propto \frac{1}{d}

<em>In this case as the distance between the plates increases the capacitance decreases while area and permittivity of free space remains constant.</em>

ii)

As the amount of charge has nothing to do with the plate separation in case of an open circuit hence the charge Q remains constant.

iii)

Electric field between the plates is given as:

E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}

where:

charge density, \sigma=\frac{Q}{A}

<em>As we know that distance of plate separation cannot affect area of the plate. Charge Q and permittivity are also not affected by it, so E remains constant.</em>

iv)

  • From the basic definition of voltage we know that it is the work done per unit charge to move it through a distance.
  • Here we increase the distance so the work done per unit charge increases.
6 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLEASE!!!!!
ycow [4]

Who conducted the study?

Explanation:

One good question to ask the toothpaste making company is who conducted the study?

A company making toothpaste claiming a scientific study revealed that their toothpaste makes the mouth five times cleaner must have introduced a bias in this finding.

  • For a scientific study to be accepted and substantiated, it must have been tested and repeated by other scientists.
  • If no other scientist confirms this, then there is an obvious bias in the claim and it is not scientific.

Learn more:

Objective reporting brainly.com/question/2242789

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
4 years ago
In what way are all sounds alike?
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

D. all sounds are caused by vibrations

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
HELP I DON'T PAY ATTENTION ENOUGH
Setler [38]

Answer:

I think 1 is d and 2 is A

Explanation:

but I may be wrong and I am so sorry if I am

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does scientific knowledge develop through making observations about the natural world ?
    11·1 answer
  • A car is rounding a curve that is the arc of a circle with a radius of r . if the car has a constant speed of 10 m/s, and its ac
    11·1 answer
  • 3. Someone at the third-floor window (12.0 m above the ground) hurls a ball downward at an angle of
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a neutral atom and an ion?
    14·2 answers
  • Using the information learned from the pendulum demonstration, when the pendulum is at it's lowest point, what type of energy do
    8·2 answers
  • When an object gains kinetic energy, is the work done the object postive, negative, or zero?
    5·1 answer
  • An ant crawls in a straight line at a constant speed of 0.24 m/s for a distance of 3.0 m, beginning in the corner of a square cl
    8·1 answer
  • The emission spectrums are known for the elements below.
    7·1 answer
  • A person sitting on the outer edge of a merry-go-round travels _____________ a person sitting near the center.
    8·1 answer
  • The source of the hot, intergalactic gas in many rich, regular clusters of galaxies appears to be.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!