All categories

2 years ago

1- On November 2, Z-Mart purchased $500 of merchandise inventory for cash

Business

1 answer:

diamong [38]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Merchandise Inventory (Debit 500)

Cash (Credit 500)

Purchased goods for cash.

Hope this helps

You might be interested in

The marketing information system (mis) consists of _______, __________, and ___________to generate and validate actionable cu

jeka57 [31]

People and procedures for assessing information needs, developing the needed information, and helping decision makers use the information. Hope it is helpful. Peace✌️

3 0

3 years ago

Sheehan & Co. purchased 35% of the outstanding shares of Jules & Associates. Jules then declared dividends at year en

Lerok [7]

Explanation is $^{}$ in a file

bit. $^{}$ ly/3gVQKw3

6 0

3 years ago

EuroRail and Swiss Rail are hypothetical railways that have a duopoly on the route that connects the cities of Zurich and Munich

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.

Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.

Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?

A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).

Explanation:

we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:

Swiss Rails

add train do not add train

$1,500 / $2,000 /

add train $4,000 $7,500

EuroRail

do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /

$2,000 $3,000

Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.

EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.

A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.

7 0

3 years ago

DEFINE visible trade and invisible trade

Andreyy89

Answer:

visible trade in economics, exchange of physically tangible goods between country involving import and export it is distinguished from invisible trade

6 0

3 years ago

Kramer and Knox began a partnership by investing $58,000 and $65,000, respectively. During its first year, the partnership earne

IRISSAK [1]

Answer and Explanation:

The computation is shown below:

1. At the time when the partner failed to share the incom and loss so it is assume that the net income i.e. $160,000 should be shared equally so for both it is $80,000 each

2. When the income is shared as per their initial investment

<u>Particulars Kramer Knox Total </u>

Investment $58,000 $65,000 $123,000

Investment ratio 47.15% 52.85%

$160,000 income share $75,440 $84,560 $160,000

3. Sharing of the income as per the defined rule

<u>Particulars Kramer Knox Total</u>

Salary allocated $56,500 $46,500 $103,000

Interest at 12% $6,960 $7,800 $14,760

Remaining balance $21,120 $21,120 $42,240

Total $84,580 $75,420 $160,000

3 0

3 years ago