Answer:
Lamination= $50,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Metro Inc. has two production departments:
Lamination and Molding
Three service departments:
Human Resources, Technology Support, and Purchasing.
The $200,000 costs of Human Resources are allocated based on the number of employees in each production department.
The Lamination department has 40 employees.
The Molding department has 120 employees.
Proportion of employees:
Lamination= 40/160= 25%
Molding= 120/160= 75%
Allocation:
Lamination= 200,000*0.25= $50,000
Molding= 200,000*0-75= $150,000
Answer:
The estimated inventory at the end of February is $73400 as shown below
Explanation:
Beginning Inventory $57,800
Plus: Net purchases $120000
Freight-in $2,700
Cost of Goods Available for Sale $180500
less: Cost of Goods Sold
Net Sales$180000
Less Estimated Gross Profit $81000
Estimated Cost of Goods Sold $99000
Estimated Inventory before Theft 81500
Less: Stolen Inventory 8,100
Estimated Ending Inventory 73400
Gross profit $180000*45%=$81000
Answer:
Given: Total shift time = 8 hours = 8 * 60 = 480 minutes
time required for production of one saw = 6 minutes
Demand for Bow saw = Demand for frame saw = Demand for dovetail saw = 1/2 * Demand of Tenon saw
a) Mixed model schedule:
Mixed model schedule
Product no. per batch
Bow Saw 1
Frame Saw 1
Dovetail Saw 1
Tenon Saw 2
Total 5
Therefore 2 Tenon Saw, and each bow, frame, and dovetail saws will be produced before the cycle is repeated.
b) 2 Tenon Saw, 1 bow, 1 frame, and 1 dovetail saws will be produced under production sequence for one unit production.
The length of cycle will be 5*6=30 minutes i.e. the cycle will repeat once in 30 minutes for 8 hours means totally it will repeat 16 times during one shift.
c) Number of saws Swenson produce in one shift = Number of Bow saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Frame saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Dovetail saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Tenon saw Swenson produce in one shift
Explanation:
Answer:
Turbo Tech has been able to offer more perceived value than Best Mobile
Explanation:
Turbo Tech has managed to market itself as a superior brand compared to Best Mobile. Through aggressive marketing, Turbo has convinced the industry that it is better than Best mobile.
Marketing is about creating brand perception. If customers agree with your arguments, the brand gains an advantage in the market. Perception is not reality. These two competitors have the same unit cost and market price. It could mean that their quality is also on the same level.
Turbo Tech has a better martketing strategy than Best Mobile.