What might happen if Congress did not have non legislative powers

History

1 answer:

timama [110]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

It did not control the government well.

Explanation:

If Congress did not have non legislative powers, it did not control the government well because non legislative powers gives ultimate power to Congress such as impeachment , confirmation and investigative power. With these non legislative powers, the Congress done its work very well and strong control over officials of their government. So if Congress did not have non legislative powers, it is difficult for them to control its officials and other problems.

You might be interested in

President Lincoln promoted Ulysses S. Grant to Chief of the Union forces after his victories in Vicksburg and Chattanooga.

Greeley [361]

Answer:

Explanation:

false

8 0

3 years ago

Name three public services that government provides.

navik [9.2K]

<h3>Education, Healthcare, Economic Security, Social Security.</h3>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A los ciudadanos atenienses les interesaba ser parte del gobierno. De hecho, la democracia moderna tiene sus raíces allí. Debido

Lapatulllka [165]

No hay duda de que es solo un pasaje

7 0

3 years ago

How did congressional neutrality towards slavery in the federal territories actually stir up sectional strife

dusya [7]

Answer:

The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.

Explanation:

When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.

However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.

8 0

3 years ago

Do you think you think the slave economy increased sectional tension in the antebellum period?How so?

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

In my opinion yes.

Explanation:

I think that it caused more tension sectionally because there was already tension between slave and non-slave states so it's growing economy just added more. Hope this helped!! Have a good day :)

3 0

3 years ago