Answer:
a specific claim about a particular subject that must be proved with evidence.
Explanation:
It makes the most sense after you use process of elimination.
Answer:
A site which includes external links to reputable sources
Explanation:
A site with too little text may be trying to avoid the point, or perhaps they really don't know that much. A site with only a few sources listed may be unreliable since they could've just made up what they wrote with no evidence. A site with reputable sources would be the answer since a reputable source would not be indeed reputable without the validations of the people.
Answer: D. to inform readers about Blair's apology
Explanation:
The article excerpt provides information about Blair's apology in an unbiased way, meaning that it doesn´t intend to convince the reader of whether an apology was in order or not.
Option A is incorrect because the idea that British diplomats had allegedly been working non-stop is how Blair, and not the article, intends to persuade people not to blame them. Option B is incorrect because the article doesn´t ask or even hint for people to help British survivors. Option C is incorrect because the article is not meant to explain why Britons were deserted, but to inform how Blair considers they were not deserted at all.
I think your answer would be B, it points forward.
Answer:
AGREE THEY SHOULD because it will give you a better life for college and prepare you better for your career. It gets them a better living out of stresses for money and family care, may students from highschool are falling down and behind, they are insecure of what they want to do and when they grow up they wont know how to manage their life in their adult age
Explanation:
