The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
Answer:
The message that Washinton wanted to convey through quote is that looking back is futile uunless one is looking back to derive useful lessons.
Explanation:
George Washington was the First President of the United States and one of the Founding Fathers along with Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and others. He served in the Office from 1789-1797. He mainly worked for the development of his country, thus also known as 'Father of the Country.'
<u>The stated quote talks about the futility of looking back in the past. Since one can not go back to past to rectify the errors so it is worthless to mourn over those mistakes made in the past. The quote is conveying the message of moving forward in life with the lessons learned from the past errors.</u>
<u>Through this quote, Wasginton is telling us to stop mulling over past mistakes and move forward in the life with the lessons learned by them and the experience gained from it.</u>
A. Major Ethnic Groups of North Africa
Answer:
The following text belongs to the first part of the question:
At the large multi-specialty clinic in which you work, there have been two near misses and one medical error because various clinicians did not follow up on patient results. Different caregivers were involved each time. When asked why they failed to follow up, each caregiver said he or she forgot.
The correct answer is:
a) Human error
Explanation:
In this case the general behavior from the caregivers could be classified as a human error, since it is a conduct that was not intentionally developed. As it possible to see in this specific case, human errors can be perceived in any environment in which the human intervention is carried out, because it is considered a really common behavior that can be prevented taking into account the high risk that it might involve depending on the ambit and responsibilities of the participants of the process.
Answer:
808 minutes
Explanation:
Let the time taken by Trent be A and the time taken by Lois be B.
The total time (T) it will take both of them if they work together is given by the equation below;
Total time (T) = (AB)/(A+ B)
= (4040 x 1010)/(4040 + 1010)
= 4,080,400/5050
Total time = 808 minutes.
