Answer:
Most likely because it interfered with and suggested going against Japanese tradition...
Explanation:
Some people hesitate letting in new religions or events into their culture because they're worried about the effects it will have on them and their traditions and if any will be replaced by new ones they dislike.
The foreign powers treat the US under the articles of confederation because t<span>he American government was unable to control how much money the US made. I hoped that helped.</span>
The answer is subconscious. It is because our subconscious is the part of the mind in every individual in which a person is not fully aware of all the things around him or her but in a way these influences other people without knowing it and the defense mechanism are the one responsible for protecting an individual in things that may affect the person without knowing it such as his or her feelings.
Answer:
what is one way the u.s. government influences the economy is:
A.) controls all the countries banks.
Explanation:
The U.S. government uses two types of policies—monetary policy and fiscal policy—to influence economic performance. Both have the same purpose: to help the economy achieve growth, full employment, and price stability. Monetary policy is used to control the money supply and interest rates.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
