Answer:
B. They had no representation in Parliament.
Explanation:
After the French and Indian War, the British Crown increased taxes to pay the enormous debts it had incurred in to win the war with France. This caused much discontent among American colonists; one common complaint of this time was "taxation without representation." The colonists felt they were carrying a too heavy burden without having the right to choose their representatives in the British Parliament or sending envoys. This is a factor leading to the Revolutionary War.
With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Today we trade (aka imperialism) by paying , or going into stores , this is different from back then because we use to just give each other items in exchange for something or to learn something.
Imperialism is just another word for trade really.
i really hope this helps you a lot. :)
Is this a question or statement????
Answer:
a. They were unsure they could protect themselves if attacked by larger nations.
Explanation: is correct
