Answer:
In a Scrum project, the work or the tasks are not allotted specifically. The Scrum Master is not allowed to assign tasks to the team members under any circumstance. Once the client provides the details regarding their requirements in detail, the tasks are distributed based on the expertise and skills of the employee.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
In digital image processing, degradation is a process of introducing defects to the image. Understanding the degradation function will allow restoration of the original image.
There are many different causes for image degradation such as motion blur, digital noise and lens off-focus. In cases like motion blur, it is possible to come up with an very good estimate of the actual blurring function and "undo" the blur to restore the original image. For digital noise, a statistical model can be set up to compensate for the degradation it caused. Similarly lens focus can be compensate by an optical model if the mis-focus is known.
The above are three degradations that I could find. A lot more information can be found about restoration functions. If you search for image degradation online, you will find a discussion on Quora and an interesting introduction from Rice University. Good luck!
Answer:
Digital Certificate is the correct answer of this question.
Explanation:
Digital certificates are always for encryption and identification for transmitting public keys.The concept of digital certificate is a data structure used for linking an authenticated person to a public key. It is used to cryptographically attach public key rights to the organization that controls it.
<u>For example</u>:- Verisign, Entrust, etc.
- An appendix to an electronic document that is used for authentication purposes.
- A digital certificate's most frequent use is to confirm that an user sending a message is who he or she appears to be, and provide the recipient with the means to encode a response.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
C
Explanation:
If you look at the picture, you will see why it is C. It says D, but the multiple choices are differently ordered and it is kind of differently worded.
But in conclusion, the answer is C.
