Should the U.S. president be elected by national popular vote?

Social Studies

2 answers:

77julia77 [94]2 years ago

7 0

Yes the us president should be elected by national popular vote

antoniya [11.8K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

well this all depends on a person's opinion but the system we have now is a majority vote or what you would call it, a national popular vote. What i mean by this is that states get to be represented equally. we have this system because then the states with a smaller population get to "voice their opinion"

Explanation:

let me explain. so if a state like Wyoming with only 580,000 people voted for democrats and a large state like Texas with 29mil voted for republicans, then obviously the republicans would win because theres just more people in Texas and they all want the republicans to win. With the majority vote, Wyoming counts as one for the democrats, and Texas counts as 1 vote for the republicans. it all depends on what you think works best and yeah i think the system is pretty well thought out because if you grow up in a place like texas, the majority of people there will go republican and thats just not fair when you think about it because states with a smaller population but think differently wont get a say.

You might be interested in

Which piece of legislation would simon pokagon have been most likely to oppose?

Alinara [238K]

The Dawes act, found the answer on quizlet

8 0

3 years ago

______ moved his/her country's capital and forced his country to modernize

Ludmilka [50]

Peter The Great moved the Capital of Russia to St. Petersburg and helped modernize the country into a thriving nation. He sent Russians to western schools so that they returned as experienced man, he stimulated the industry and commerce, he promoted metallurgy as a new industry and soon became a top producer in cast iron melting. He helped create the modernized russian nation we know today.

8 0

3 years ago

Because of the cost of medical school, poorer students may be less likely to become doctors than higher socio-economic status st

LiRa [457]

Answer:C) Conflict Theorists

Explanation:According to conflict theorists society is in a constant conflict because of the competition for limited resources. Social stratification has resulted into a state where those with power and wealth reign over those who are powerless and poor.

The rich keeping getting what they want and taking everything for themselves whilst the poor are restricted and controlled by the rich. The rich make the rules which supresses the poor.

The rich get better Educational opportunities whilst the poor can't afford such opportunities.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did the United Sates declare war on the British?

OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:Trade restrictions

Explanation:

There were multiple factors that caused the US declaration of war on Britain: A series of trade restrictions introduced by Britain to impede American trade with France with which Britain was at war (the US contested the restrictions as illegal under international law

3 0

3 years ago

a clash of values is when one person’s values do not agree with another person’s values. governments are put into place to insur

Sphinxa [80]

When societies do not have a government it leads to disorder and riots in the society. No government leads to imbalance and inefficiency.

A society not having any government faces many problems regarding the governing as it may be ruled by the privileged only. In the absence only the rich and powerful shall execute their order and the poor and underprivileged might suffer. Riots may also break out from time to time as people might fight for facilities or as a result of protest.

Health facilities, education, shelter, job opportunities might only become a luxury to the people in the absence of any controlling body. Famine might break out or an inflation of currency might occur when no governing body is present.

To know more about inflation of currency refer to the link below

brainly.com/question/850547

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago