Life and Liberty are examples of Individual Rights
Answer:
b. feel and act "different" from childhood on.
Explanation:
Nurture plays an important role in the development of a child. The environment in which a child is being placed tends to determine the nature and habit of the child. Also, a child develops a great part of hir or her personality in childhood only.
Since, the child who was born as a biological female and was raised as a male tends to behave like a boy because the girl is being given a male name, dressed up as a male etc. These things will have a great impact on the girl's life as the people around the child will treat her that way.
The Cultural Revolution<span>, formally the </span>Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution<span>, was a sociopolitical </span>movement<span> that took place in </span>China<span> from 1966 until 1976. Set into motion by </span>Mao Zedong<span>, then </span>Chairman of the Communist Party of China<span>, its stated goal was to preserve 'true' </span>Communist ideology<span> in the country by purging remnants of </span>capitalist<span>and </span>traditional<span> elements from Chinese society, and to re-impose </span>Maoist<span> thought as the </span>dominant ideology<span> within the Party. The Revolution marked the return of Mao Zedong to a position of power after the </span>Great Leap Forward<span>. The movement paralyzed China politically and negatively affected the country's economy and society to a significant degree.</span>
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
