Answer:
A. that my answers
Explanation:
Jones and smith share the same cuvical in the officce. Jones loves to listen to music on his speakers while working. Smith is not able to concentrate on his work in the presence of music. Jones recieves benefits worth $200 regardless of whether he listen to music on his speakers or headphones. The cost of headphones is $50. SMith is not abke to conecentrate on his work and suffers damages worth $350 when Jones listens to music without his headphones. Smith does not suffer any damages when Jones listens to music on his headphones.
Suppose the office does not have any rules against listening to music on speakers while working. In thisâ case, if Jones and Smith do notâ communicate, the market outcome is that:
a. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is not able to concentrate on his work
b. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; however, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
c. Jones starts listening to music on headphones; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
d. Jones stops listening to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
Answer:
260 million. The answer is not in the available options.
Explanation:
Projected benefit obligation as at January 01, 2018 250
Add: Service cost 30
Add: Interest Cost (250*6%) 15
Less: Retiree benefits paid 35
Projected benefit obligation as at December 31, 2018 260
Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.
What I would do is do the percentages one by one and then you complete the actual project it’s self.
Answer:
Group think bias
Explanation:
Groupthink bias occurs when people believe in something because other people believe in it. It is when everyone comes to the same conclusion concerning a matter.
In the meeting everyone agreed with the CEO, this is an instance of groupthink.
Anchoring bias is when a person's decision is overly anchored on an initial information given when making a decision.
Confirmation bias is when a person arrives at a conclusion in line with their beliefs.
Availability bias is basing decisions on past instances that comes to mind when making the decision.
Hindsight bias occurs when people over estimate their abilities to predict how an event would have turned out in hindsight.