Answer: Because the suspect may have a reason for his or her fiber being there.
Explanation: if they are a roommate, friend, or someone who had access to the crime scene, the evidence of a matching fiber could easily be explained away. It is best to question a suspect about if they had been to that location before. If they say no, they are locked into that answer, thus there is no innocent excuse for the fiber being present.
Punitive damages are those sought by a plaintiff who wants to hold the defendant accountable and deter future wrongdoers from acting in the same way.
<h3><u>How do punitive damages work?</u></h3>
In addition to compensatory damages, a defendant who is found guilty of a crime or wrong is also required to pay punitive damages. When compensatory damages, or the money paid to the injured party, are deemed to be insufficient, they are granted.
Punitive damages go above and beyond reimbursing the wronged party. They are intended specifically to punish defendants whose actions are deemed to be willful or grossly negligent. Since they are meant to serve as a warning to prevent repeat offenses, punitive damages are also known as exemplary damages.
Learn more about punitive damages with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
Answer:
Mean for shop A because the data distribution is symmetric; median for shop B because the data distribution is not symmetric
Explanation:
Answer:
lma0 no one will not to be rude but you need to get a life and use brainly for school not zoom
Explanation:
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
