1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikitadnepr [17]
2 years ago
9

A man lends his handgun to his brother who says he will use it to hold up a local convenience store. The man is aware of his bro

ther’s intention to commit a crime and lends him the gun anyway. Question 5 of 6 What was the actus reus?
Law
1 answer:
poizon [28]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: The actus reus was aiding and abetting. The mens rea was knowing.

Explanation: The man handed over the gun to his brother knowingly helped his brother commit a crime. This makes the man an accomplice to the convenience store hold up, as there was nothing he did to prevent the crime from happening.

You might be interested in
Victims can avoid being at fault for being bullied by:
vampirchik [111]

The answer is A) Victims are never at fault for being bullied

4 0
3 years ago
Which provision of the U.S. Constitution clarifies conflicts between the laws of a state and the laws of the nation?
mrs_skeptik [129]
C) Supremacy clause :)
7 0
3 years ago
What is an example of a tier 2 police encounter?
Gwar [14]

Answer:

The second type of encounter occurs when an officer believes there may be some sort of suspicious activity occurring which may justify police involvement.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
In this course, glossary terms are
storchak [24]

Answer:

This glossary of Course terms, written by Robert Perry, attempts to clarify the special meaning the Course gives familiar words like God, forgiveness, and miracle. Where applicable, it sets the Course’s meaning alongside the conventional definition and/or the traditional Christian usage. This glossary is keyed to the FIP edition of the Course.

5 0
1 year ago
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion. True or False
nydimaria [60]

The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.

Answer: Option 1

<u>Explanation: </u>

The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.

The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard.  If in the case raised, then the President,  only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on our studies and understanding of the constitution as well as the principles from which it was founded on, Do you believ
    10·1 answer
  • Punitive damages are: a. generally not available in tort cases. b. often awarded in cases of contract interference. c. only avai
    9·1 answer
  • Which feature of a microblog allows a user to repost another user's content?
    6·1 answer
  • I need to write an apology cuz i prank called a pizza place to my friends house and they told my parents i was wondering if this
    12·2 answers
  • Jessa wants to sell her product to a skeptical customer, so she claims it will last forever, even
    6·1 answer
  • Johnson<br> And<br> Baseball<br> Torture<br> From<br> Wikipedia<br> the<br> Free<br> Encyclopedia!
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think police officers can do their jobs with integrity and keep the public safe at the same time?
    15·1 answer
  • Which document prohibited Americans from fighting in the war between Great Britain and France?
    14·1 answer
  • How to flirt? ... .... ....​
    13·2 answers
  • Chính quyền và mỗi công dân cần làm gì để hiến pháp đc tôn trọng nhất
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!