Answer: E) Law of Effect; operant conditioning
The full question is as follows:
“Thorndike is to __ as Skinner is to__ A)classical conditioning; Law of Effect B)classical conditioning; operant conditioning C)operant conditioning; classical conditioning D)Law of Effect; classical conditioning E)Law of Effect; operant conditioning”
The Conditioning Theory is a behavioral process, whereby a response (reaction) becomes more frequent to a given object (stimulus) because of a reward (reinforcement) for the response in a given situation.
<span>Two most important of these theories are Law of Effect proposed by Edward Thorndike and operant conditioning by </span><span>Burrhus Frederic Skinner.</span>
Answer:11 seconds
Explanation: It would take approximately 11 seconds to safely turn right and merge into traffic moving at about 55 mph.
Answer:
a.No contract was formed because the offer was not communicated to the offeree by the means chosen by the offeror.
Explanation:
Hello! It was an oversight on the part of the secretary to comment on the proposal informally, as it ended up contaminating the entire plan that the boss had in her new offer for Deanna, causing discontent because the contract was serious and it's converted in an unprofessional situation.
Thanks for your question!
Answer:
Explanation:
It definitely means that as the quality of education improves, it is directly proportional to the increase in productivity of labour or in other words , it means that as there is an increase in the quality of education, it is directly proportional to the increase of productivity of labour. As quality improves, productivity improves likewise. If quality of education decrease, then there is tendency that the productivity of labour will decrease., so therefore an increase in productivity of labour is a function of an increase in quality of education.
Answer:
The availability of many alternatives to a partner in a relationship "increases that partner's social power".
Explanation:
Social power is the degree to which an individual can influence others or resist being influenced by others.
When a partner in a relationship (say partner A) has many alternatives, then the influence the other partner (say partner B) will have over partner A will decrease.
As such, partner A's social power increases.
