The correct answer that would best fit the given statement above would be option D. The concept model is the most recognized model for explaining how concepts are formed. The conceptual model serves as a representation which is made of the concepts in order to assist the audience to know, understand and simulate a subject that the model represents.
Here is the full data for the quesion
<span>
At the large multi-specialty clinic in which you work, there have been two near misses and one medical error because various clinicians did not follow up on patient results. Different caregivers were involved each time. After the second near miss, the physician involved was asked to leave the clinic.
</span><span>This outcome is an example of a failure of which aspect of a culture of safety?</span>
The answer is Fairness
In the aspect of a culture safety, fairness refers to the fact that all people should be held accountable for their action.
In that case above, The clinicians should be held responsible for their action by giving them some sort of warning/trial and give the patients a fair compensation for the damage that the clinic has done.
The person that is most strongly associated with identifying deficits in the motor speech area and in the ability to produce speech is Paul Broca.
Paul Broca is mostly associated with the Broca research. His research on the Broca area is mostly associated with language deficits.
Paul broca's research is mostly known today for the recognition of the the part of the brain that is responsible for speech which is located on the frontal lobes of the brain.
Read more on brainly.com/question/14437119?referrer=searchResults
To make money.
You often have to pay interest on your loans, so the longer you take out a loan the more the bank gets.
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
