1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
11

I

History
1 answer:
svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is Appeasement

The appeasement policy was a measure taken by European economic powers (England and France). It consisted of not stopping the advance and popularity of Nazifascisms, with the intention that Nazi Germany and fascist Italy would bar or even fight communism in the USSR. Since these countries, Germany and Italy were opposed to the communist idea.

This is the biggest and best explanation given as a reason why the economic powers have done nothing to stop Nazism and fascism.

You might be interested in
The United States Senator who led the noninterventionists in Congress and called for neutrality legislation in the 1930s was .
lina2011 [118]
The answer is Gerald P. Nye.
7 0
3 years ago
North is to union as south is to what
yKpoI14uk [10]
South is to confederacy
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What made Germany’s invasions of Europe difficult to stop during World War II
anyanavicka [17]
Their Blitzkrieg tactics was so brutal and quick
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what two industries did Asian immigrants find work?​
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer: hope this helps!

Explanation:

Railroad workers and laborers in mining.

5 0
3 years ago
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Mashcka [7]

Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.

<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.

The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What can you infer about the economy, ideology, and technology of the Mongols from the descriptions given?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of the long-term impact of the Byzantine Empire on eastern Europe? A) the spread of Eastern Orthodo
    10·2 answers
  • How did Hitler's views compare with American views in the same time period? (Specifically, WW2).
    5·1 answer
  • the confiscation acts allowed the government to seize property from easterners westerners patriots loyalists who had supported b
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Roman invasion significant to the Greek culture?
    9·1 answer
  • A) Analyze how the US government has responded to the increasing complexity of US foreign policy.
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement explains the purpose of the Preamble to the United States Constitution?
    13·1 answer
  • SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP ME I ONLY HAVE TILL 11;59<br> how did william c nell impact society??
    9·2 answers
  • 2.) What are historical periods?
    12·1 answer
  • Why does Holton call writing a will “the ultimate act of rebellion”?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!