Churchill<span> claimed that the </span>Soviet Union did<span> not want a war, but to get the fruits of war and indefinite amount of expansion.</span>
Pio de Jesus<span> was the last governor of Mexican California.</span>
By eliminating competition, trusts could charge whatever price they choose
1. The correct answer is: A. They were able to sign an agreement that forbid the import of Italian goods but that really did nothing.
The emperor of Abyssinia asked for the intervention of the League of Nations. The League condemned the Italian actions and imposes economic sanctions, but does not include exports of coal, oil and steel to Italy. It did help much.
2. The correct answer is: B. Morality of nuclear warfare
The consequences of the nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of the war began the debate on the dangers of a nuclear war that could wipe out entire nations
. The human damage is too big and it began to be questioned if the use of this weapons was ethical even in war.
3. The correct answer is: C. Make German leader accountable for the Holocaust.
The Allies held this Trials at the end of World War II in which the responsibilities of leaders, officials and collaborators of the Nazi regime were determined and sanctioned. It includes war crimes and of course, the Holocaust.
Thomas Jefferson and his party believed in an agrarian community. One in which the economy was dependent on crops, his views were that if the states provided crops like cotton to Britain then Britain in exchange would give them goods such as textiles. This worked for a period of time because England had just developed the cotton gin so they needed cotton in order to produce clothing.
Alexander Hamilton rather believed in a strong federal government dependent on industries. He thought the creation of a national debt would help the US because it would develop good credit with other nations which would give the US good standing to receive loans. Hamilton even founded the first national Bank of America. His view on government was more centralized then what Jeffersonians wanted. Jeffersonians were the ones who believed firmly in state rights and limited federal interference. This cause arguments between the two parties.