1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
6

If a elevator traveled 10 floors in 5 seconds , how many floors did it travel in 1 second ?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Ivahew [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

it's division 10/5 is 2 which means in one second it travels 2 floors

d1i1m1o1n [39]3 years ago
8 0
Answer: 2

5/5 = 1
10/5 = 2

2 floors/second
You might be interested in
As seen in the diagram below, Hawa is building a walkway with a width of a feet to go
slega [8]

Answer:

8 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

you have to calculate :(19+2x)(6+2x)=770

you will get X1=8,X2= negetive some value but measurement cant be negative .if you put X=8 you'll find LHS=RHS

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Josie took a long multiple-choice, end-of-year vocabulary test. The ratio of the number of problems Josie got incorrect to the n
FrozenT [24]

Answer:

A. Josie got 36 correct answers.

B. Josie got 90 correct answers.

C. 8:36 and 20:90

D.6:27, 12:54, 30:135, among others.

e. Multiply both numbers on the ratio by the same constant integer, thereby ensuring that the resulting numbers form a ratio equivalent to the original.

Step-by-step explanation:

Very well, so the statement is that Josie got 2 problems incorrect for every 9 that she got correct. First the ask how many questions she got correct given that she missed 8 question. First, we divide the 8 question she missed by 2. Now have 4 pairs of questions that Josie missed and for every pair that she failed; Josie got 9 questions correctly. Therefore, we multiply 4 pairs of incorrect questions times 9 correct questions. So, if Josie had 8 incorrect questions, she also had 36 correct answers on her test.

In the case that Josie missed 20 questions, we divide them by two again in order to obtain the number of pairs that Josie missed. Now have 10 pairs of questions that Josie missed and for every pair that she failed; Josie got 9 questions correctly. Therefore, we multiply 10 pairs of incorrect questions times 9 correct questions. So, if Josie had 8 incorrect questions, she also had 90 correct answers on her test.

With the information we collected, we can affirm that the ratios 8:36 and 20:90 are equivalents to the original 2:9 that was stated. Other examples of equivalents ratios could be 6:27, 12/54, 30:135, among many others.

To find the equivalent ratios what we need to do is find common multiples of the numbers that conform the ratio. To do so, we can multiply both numbers by the same constant integer, thereby ensuring that the resulting numbers form a ratio equivalent to the original.

Have a nice day! :D

6 0
3 years ago
Explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments in your own words.
lyudmila [28]

Answer: The difference is as follows:

Step-by-step explanation:

  • Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument is an argument wherein it is felt that the premises give an assurance of reality of the end. In a deductive arguments, the premises are planned to offer help for the conclusion that is so strong to an extent that, if the premises are valid, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false.

  • Inductive Arguments: An inductive arguments is an arguments where it is believed that the premises provide reasons supporting the likely truth of the conclusion. In an inductive arguments, the premises are proposed distinctly to be strong to an extent that, on the off chance that they are valid, at that point it is impossible that the conclusion is false.

The contrast between the two originates from the kind of connection the author or explainer of the argument takes there to be between the premises and the conclusion. In the event that the author of the argument accepts that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion because of definition, l<igical entailment or scientific need, at that point the argument is deductive. In the event that the author of the argument does not feel that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion, however in any case accepts that their fact gives valid justification to accept the conclusion genuine, at that point the argument is inductive.

5 0
3 years ago
The second derivative of acos(kx) ​
Shkiper50 [21]
F’(x)= -akxsinkx

F’’(x)= -a(kx)^2coskx

I’m really sorry if the answer turned out wrong but I tried my best!
8 0
2 years ago
How do u type negative one on here
ipn [44]

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The masses of two objects are compared during a physics experiment. It is determined that object A has a mass of 4×10−3 grams an
    6·1 answer
  • What is the probability against drawing a 7 from a standard deck of 52 cards ? ( percentage% )
    11·1 answer
  • Which shows the number subsets to which the number<br> - v144 belongs?
    6·1 answer
  • Share
    15·1 answer
  • Greg's ceiling fan rotates 30 degrees and then stops. How many more times does it need to rotate to make a full rotation?
    7·1 answer
  • Find an expression for the area of this rectangle<br><br> (2x+1) (x+8)
    12·2 answers
  • 5x + 2y = -5<br> X + 3y = 1
    8·1 answer
  • Help me figure this out
    13·1 answer
  • A furniture factory can box a desk chair in 15 seconds. what is the rate per minute
    14·1 answer
  • All of the following have the same value except 9+(-6) -6-(-9) 6-9 9-6​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!