1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ray Of Light [21]
3 years ago
10

At both the state and federal level, the power to veto is vested in which

History
1 answer:
NARA [144]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Chief Executive

Explanation:

In both the Federal and State Governments, the power to veto is vested in the hands of the Chief Executive, which is a Governor at the State level and the President at the national level.

You might be interested in
________ reinforced the idea of "separate but equal" in everyday American life.
Eduardwww [97]
A) Jim Crow Laws is probably the answer. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were trusts and holding companies treated under the law?
stich3 [128]

Answer:

A. trusts had no federal backing or insuring holding companies were also considered private lenders and holders so there was no federal back Lash therefore monopoly laws didnt apply.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which colony relied most on plantations to fuel its
alekssr [168]
Yes it’s Virginia- they had many cash crops! They grew lots of tobacco and made tons of money!
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these was the main constitutional principle under Magna Carta?
Nana76 [90]
The answer is C. Everyone, even the king, has to obey the law.

The Magna Carta (1215) was the first law that dictated that even the king was a subject to law.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the benefit of rebuilding japan and germany after ww2
    11·1 answer
  • As more settlers moved west, how did they interact with native tribes?
    15·1 answer
  • What battles did the axis powers win in ww2
    7·1 answer
  • Where were the final battles of the American Revolution fought (In the<br> North or South)?
    5·1 answer
  • When James II became king, many people opposed him because he was a
    10·2 answers
  • What are examples of how assimilation be a positive thing
    5·1 answer
  • Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) People of various races riding on a bus with the ability to sit anywhere. © 2012 The
    7·1 answer
  • 1.What might be some positive effects of living in a city which such diverse beliefs systems?
    6·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a First Amendment right?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!