What are courts often involved in cases concerning eminent domain

Law

1 answer:

Helga [31]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states

You might be interested in

To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, what should do government do?

HACTEHA [7]

To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, the U.S. government is most likely to use Tariff. To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, the U.S. government is most likely to use Tariff.

7 0

3 years ago

Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?

KIM [24]

$\large{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\sf{\color{yellow}{Answer:}}}}}}$

No criminal crime should not be heard judges other than professional and paid judges because they have a lot of experience about these kinds of cases

5 0

3 years ago

How does Article III protect the political rights of judges? Of individuals?

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?

nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0

2 years ago

Why was the issue of searching a person's property so important in the time before the American Revolution?

bazaltina [42]

First option: There was much theft occurring before the Revolution and unjustified search was the only way to reclaim goods.

The settlers in the "New World" responded to the strict mercantilist policies of the British Crown by smuggling and taking part in illicit trade. The British would attempt to impose revenue laws, but it was unsuccessful until British authorities made use of writs of assistance (general warrants; allowed the bearer to seize any prohibited goods, and etc).

8 0

2 years ago