I believe it is C. In writing, we can more easily conceal our attitudes.
The correct answer is the second bubble.
I hope this helps!
Feek free to mark brainliest!
Answer:
An email to cousin Prateek to inform that his father has sustained minor injuries and is at present out of danger after the bomb blast in Sarojini Nagar snuffed out a number of lives.
Explanation:
B Avenue, 1st Lane, 09.01.2020
Addison, Dallas County,
Texas
75001
Dear Prateek,
I know you are worried and must have tried reaching out to us a million times but the communication and internet lines were down for many days after the attack happened. I'm glad that I can write to now after so many days.
We were supposed to meet Sunil uncle and Aarti aunty on the day the blast took place. When we were about to leave, we received the news that a bomb blast had happened in Sarojini Nagar that morning. On top of it, Aarti aunty's call got all of us panicked. Sunil uncle had gone to the same area for some work and hadn't returned for hours which got her worried. Then the news was flashed on the news channels and radio shows which caused the alarm. My father and I rushed to the hospitals near to that site and looked for Sunil uncle. After searching for the entire afternoon, we found him admitted in N.H. Care. Thankfully, he had sustained minor injuries and was kept under observation. It has been 5 days since he is out of danger and yesterday he even got discharged.
We are all safe and doing better now. Will be waiting for your reply.
Your loving brother,
Prakash
The tragedy of the commons is an economic theory of a
situation within a shared-resource system where individual users acting
independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to
the common good of all users by depleting or spoiling that resource
through their collective action. The concept and name originate in an
essay written in 1833 by the Victorian economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical example of the effects of unregulated grazing on common land (then colloquially called "the commons") in the British Isles.[1] The concept became widely known over a century later due to an article written by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968.[2] In this context, commons is taken to mean any shared and unregulated resource such as atmosphere, oceans, rivers, fish stocks, or even an office refrigerator.
It has been argued that the very term 'tragedy of the commons' is a misnomer per se,
since 'the commons' originally referred to a resource owned by a
community, and no individual outside the community had any access to the
resource. However, the term is presently used when describing a problem
where all individuals have equal and open access to a resource.
Hence, 'tragedy of open access regimes' or simply 'the open access
problem' are more apt terms.[3]:171
The tragedy of the commons is often cited in connection with sustainable development, meshing economic growth and environmental protection, as well as in the debate over global warming. It has also been used in analyzing behavior in the fields of economics, evolutionary psychology, anthropology, game theory, politics, taxation and sociology.
Although commons have been known to collapse due to overuse (such as
in over-fishing), abundant examples exist where communities cooperate or
regulate to exploit common resources prudently without collapse.
