Answer:
The thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.
Explanation:
Debt Trafficking:
When the human traffickers perform illicit relocation of the women saying them to pay off their debt after starting working at new location in some honorable business, But on their relocation, they force them into the prostitution business to pay their unlawful debt.
Debt Bondage:
It is debt which some labor contractor pays to some person and in return the person willingly delivers his services to pay his debt to the contractor
Debt Peonage:
It is the debt which first person pays to the second person and if the second person remains unsuccessful in paying his debt, the first person forces the second person to work for him at some minimal wage rate. In this way the second person becomes the victim of debt peonage.
After understanding the aforementioned concepts of three different types of debts, we conclude that the thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.
Answer:
The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.
Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.
The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.
Explanation:
1, 5,4
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
Answer:
Having no insurance and or DWI
Explanation:
