Hello,
<span> Your correct answer would be,to note details that come to mind to help decide the story’s purpose.
Hope this helps
-HotTwizzlers</span>
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
What the people native to Georgia, the Creeks and the Cherokee, might have experienced by living next to the Chattahoochee and across the river from each other could have been a sense of neighbors relationship that included cooperation in some aspects and some differences that really did not affect their relationship.
The Cherokee lived in the Mountains of Northern Georgia and its capital city was New Echota. On the other hand, the Creek lived in Southern Georgia, in the coastal plains and the piedmont. Its capital city was Coweta, close to the river. The Chattahoochee River was the geographical feature that had in common.
If you are working on a research project in which you must present a short documentary film about the history of your family, the source that would be considered most credible for this project is hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration.
You will get the most information from her letters.
It is feautrured in Songs of Experience because the poem talks about the experience of a tiger. It is a suspense poem. Indeed, the life of a tiger is full of suspenses. The poem's opening lines are:
<em>Tyger Tyger, burning bright,
</em>
<em>In the forests of the night;
</em>
<em>What immortal hand or eye,
</em>
<em>Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
</em>
The poet praises the the qualities of the tiger by asking questions without answering them. In the remaining lines of the poem, the author continues praising the perfectness of the animal, calling it dark craftsmanship. The thought-provoking point is about the comparison between <em>The Tyger</em> and the previous poem <em>The Lamb </em>which the poet himself doubts that the same God could create innocent spirit like a lamb and such a fierce animal like tiger at the same time. or it could be interpreted as God's different expressions showing his kindness in the face of lamb and his anger in the qualities of tiger.
