The creation of the German Confederation in 1815 was largely in
reaction to the growing sense of German nationalism, which had not
existed in Europe prior to the 19th century. While strains of
nationalism certainly existed before the turn of the century, it was
France's conquest of the German lands in the first decade of the 19th
century that first fully aroused German nationalists into proposing a
unified, German state. Indeed, J.G. Fichte's Addresses to the German Nation, given in Berlin in 1808, called on Germans to unite under their common language and traditions.
Perhaps
no other statesman was in such a fine position to make this dream a
reality as the Chancellor of Prussia during the mid-19th century, Otto von Bismarck.
Bismarck was a fervent German nationalist who wanted a German nation,
but specifically one dominated by his Prussia. As a result, once
appointed, Chancellor Bismarck set out to strengthen and improve the
Prussian army and gain international allies that would help Prussia on
its way to unifying Germany.
The depth of hostility felt by many white Americans toward the Indians The killing of a village of peaceful Indians for no other cause than hatred and xenophobia undoubtedly contributed to the high level of hostility toward Indians.
The Sand Creek Massacre in 1864 is a prime illustration of the animosity white men had toward Native Americans. When a cavalry came into a "camp of friendly Indians," they engaged in battle despite their best efforts to avoid it. Colonel Chivington, the commander of the cavalry, gave the order to invade this settlement, which led to the mutilation of Indian men, women, and even children.
Hatred was the prime reason for hostility towards Indians.
to learn more about hostility here
brainly.com/question/27290914
#SPJ4
The judicial branch enforces the law; making sure it is carried out and people oblige to it. They also determine if the policy is constitutional or unconstitutional.
Answer is in the file below
tinyurl.com/wpazsebu
In short, Libertarians believe the government should never violate an individuals rights (socially liberal), and should be extremely limited its power, especially in regards to the economy (economically conservative).
Carried forward, Libertarians generallysupport gay rights, a woman's right to choose ("pro-choice"), and an individuals privacy (opposed to the Patriot Act, and to a degree also opposed to the CIA). Anything that expands the individuals' rights, Libertarians support.
Economically, Libertarians generally believe that Capitalism should be unregulated. There are some blatant problems with monopoly and scams (i.e. Ponzi schemes), and a certain number of Libertarians believe there ought to be some regulation.
In a similar vein, Libertarians generally are opposed to the power of the monopoly called government. As a political philosophy, Libertarians believe the government should exist only to protect the liberties of its citizens. A strong military is acceptable, but Libertarians favor the philosophy of the founding fathers - nonintervention.
These "policies" are only as I understand them, and should not be taken as representative of all Libertarians.
