<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "John Locke," since Locke believed that leaders such as Louis XIV had an obligation to protect the rights of the citizens, and that the citizens could overthrow despotic kings such as this. </span></span>
Henry made a framework for trials that had Grand Jury Trials and normal trials. Amazing Jury trials chose whether or not the confirmation bolsters the allegation enough to go to a trial. The consistent trial chose if the blamed was honest or blameworthy. What's more, the juries were made of ordinary citizens rather than respectability.
I’m not sure if it’s right but I think it’s D I’m not sure :-)
Answer:
The Hartford Convention
Explanation:
"This mostly Federalist convention in New England ended up suggesting some constitutional amendments but was alleged to consider the secession of New England from the Union and a separate peace with Britain. After the war the convention was widely viewed as an act of treason and a black mark on the reputation of the Federalist party."
StackExchange - History
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Cars aren't restocking because of no production, therefore demand is high
