What are The two segments of the organization's environment

Because of competitive pressures, some firms have used packaging and labeling practices that are questionable, misleading, decep

Flauer [41]

Because of competitive pressures, some firms have used packaging and labeling practices that are questionable, misleading, deceptive, and unethical. this is an example of issues related to Ethics in product strategy.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is competitive pressure?</h3>

Generally, In most cases, the term "competitive pressure" refers to a circumstance in which a business is put under stress as a result of the presence of other businesses in its industry.

Typical examples of it may be found in all types of economies, with the exception of monopolistic economies.

The demand and supply dynamics of a certain market or sector are very important considerations for any business.

The concept of product ethics encompasses every aspect of a product, including the decisions made about its design and the use of technology.

Therefore, you should direct your development team to make judgments that are morally acceptable while they are creating and constructing the product.

It is important to discourage immoral activities such as the employment of dark patterns and to promote the use of technology that is peaceful.

In conclusion, Some businesses, in order to remain competitive in an increasingly cutthroat market, have resorted to dubious, misleading, dishonest, and immoral packaging and labeling tactics. This is an example of a problem that arises in product strategy that relates to ethics.

Read more about competitive pressure

brainly.com/question/15416905

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

Titanic Roofing Company has estimated the following amounts for its next fiscal year: Total fixed costs $ 840 comma 000 Sale pr

Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Operating income increases by $40,000.

Explanation:

Given that,

Total fixed costs = $840,000

Sale price per unit = $60

Variable cost per unit = $30

Additional amount spend on advertising = $35,000

Sales volume would increase by 2,500 units.

Contribution margin:

= Sales - Variable costs

= $60 - $30

= $30 per unit

Increase in operating income:

= Increase in contribution margin - Increase in Fixed costs

= ($30 × 2,500 units) - $35,000

= $75,000 - $35,000

= $40,000

3 0

3 years ago

Suppose that when disposable income decreases by $2,000, consumption spending increases by $1500. Given this information, we kno

sdas [7]

Answer:

the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75

Explanation:

The computation of the marginal propensity to consume is shown below:

MPC = Change in consumption ÷Change in disposable income

where,

The Change in consumption is 1500

ANd, the Change in disposable income is 2000

So,

MPC is

= $1,500 ÷ $2,000

= 0.75

hence, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75

4 0

3 years ago

Baker's Supply imposes a payback cutoff of 3.5 years for its international investment projects. If the company has the following

sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

Both projects fall within the acceptable payback period, so, both projects can be accepted.

Explanation:

Cash payback period measures how long it takes for the amount invested in a project to be recovered from the cumulative cash flows.

Pay back period For project A:

Amount invested in the project = −$ 62,000

Amount recovered in year 1 = −$ 62,000 + 7,100 = $-54,900

Amount recovered in year 2 = $-54,900 + 9,800 = $-45,100

Amount recovered in year 3 = $-45,100 + 28,700 = $-16,400

Amount recovered in year 4 = $-16,400 + 45,900 = $29,500

The amount is recovered In 3 years + 16400 / 45900 = 3.36 years

Cash payback period for project B:

Amount invested in the project = −$ 26,000

Amount recovered in year 1 = −$ 26,000 + 15,600 = $-10,400

Amount recovered in year 2 = $-10,400 + 8,400 = $-2000

Amount recovered in year 3 = $-2000 + 1,900 = $-100

Amount recovered in year 4 = $-100 + 1,100 = $1000

The amount invested is recovered In 3 years + 100/1,100 = 3.09 years.

Both projects fall within the acceptable payback period, so, both projects can be accepted.

I hope my answer helps you

7 0

2 years ago

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal South Carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each.

Gnoma [55]

Answer:

The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.

Explanation:

Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.

Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.

7 0

3 years ago