Answer:
Kevin is thinking about purchasing a corporate bond
Explanation:
Corporate bonds are bonds issued by firms.
Firms have two major instruments to attract investments from individual investors like Kevin: stocks and bonds.
Stocks are ownership certificates, their values and payouts fluctuates.
Bonds are debt certificates. Issuing them means the firms are obliaged to pay the interests until maturity and the face value of the bond at maturity.
Answer:
Explanation:
Scholarships and grants are monies that are given to the student for education. You DO NOT have to pay them back.
Loans can also be given for education costs but you DO have to pay them back. So, obviously, you want scholarships and grants before loans.
Answer:
$4,228,125
Explanation:
The computation of the included amount is shown below:
= Estimated production in a next year × required direct labor per hour × labor rate per hour
= 75,000 units × 4.1 hours × $13.75 per hour
= $4,228,125
We simply multiplied the estimated production with the required direct labor per hour and the labor rate per hour so that the estimated value can arrive
Answer:
The correct answer is a. corporate stories.
Explanation:
Corporate stories are events that occurred in the past, which, because of their relevance to the development of the organization, serve as a reference to project into the future. What is sought with these types of events is to motivate, encourage employees to perform their tasks in the best way, trying to make every effort to achieve it.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
