<u>Answer:</u>
The 1st Amendment ensures a few fundamental freedoms regarding the opportunity of religion, discourse, press, appeal, and get together. Understanding of the correction is a long way from simple, as court case after a court case has attempted to characterize the cutoff points of these opportunities.
The First Amendment ensures the opportunity of religion in two statements the foundation clause, which disallows the administration from building up an official church, and the "free exercise" condition that enables individuals to love however they see fit.
Answer:
Explanation:
can you write in here down caz i cant see it
Answer:
In the statements prior to the given statement, the author makes their opinion clear. The introductory sentence states, "How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction." Off of this statement alone, it is evident that the author strongly questions the morality and ethicalness of dropping a nuclear bomb. It goes on to state "This is not war: . . . this is pure nihilism."
Thus when the author states "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?" they strongly believe that dropping a nuclear bomb is immoral and unethical, they question the meaning of being human if "the very foundations or morality are overthrown" by dropping a nuclear bomb.
I hope this helps.
Warren G. Harding
Harding emerged as a compromise candidate between the conservative and progressive wings of the party, and he clinched his nomination on the tenth ballot of the 1920 Republican National Convention. ... Harding all but ignored Cox in the race and essentially campaigned against Wilson by calling for a "return to normalcy".
