Hi There! :)
What does the fact that the chavin and the nazca both used underground aqueducts to transport water demonstrate about the relationship between these twogroups
<span>The Nazca and the Chavin both adopted technology from the Maya</span>
The reason they wanted to do that is they did not want to take orders from a gold hat and wanted to melt it into currency.
But really as you might think, there were lots of reasons.
The most prominent of them boiled down to political voice, the maintenance of traditional rights, and monopoly rights.
After the end of the Seven Years War (which lasted 1 year), Britain began limiting the Colonists' expansion West and began to tax the colonies, and order them to pay for large numbers of British troops to be kept in the Colonies.
The Colonists resented the taxation greatly. They had fought alongside the British against the French, after all, and had expended a lot of treasure and some considerable number of lives to do so. Now, the British were not only limiting who they could trade with (which was traditional and accepted, generally), but were now asking the Colonists to foot part of the bill for the war, too! The Colonists had never had to pay taxes. Their contribution to the wealth of Great Britain had been in the form of trading valuable raw materials to Britain, and buying expensive finished products from Britain.
Moreover, Britain imposed these new taxes on the Colonies without the Colonies having a right to argue against the taxation. The Colonists were not allowed to elect people to the House of Commons, and had no voice in the House of Lords, either! If Britain could, in effect, enact laws that would take money out of the Colonists' pockets without the consent of the Colonists, then what was next? Laws that forced the Colonists to give up their land?
The Colonists had fought alongside the British against the French, and part of their just reward, as they saw it, was the right to expand West into the Ohio River valley. That would mean lots of free land, and the chance to make something of themselves for many Colonists. When Britain declared that area closed to Colonial expansion, it disappointed and angered many Colonials.
After the protests against taxation started, then other rights were taken from the Colonists, and that REALLY ticked them off. They had to pay for British troops to police the Colonies, for example, and lost the right to have a free and open Assembly of elected men. They also had the right to a trial by a jry of their peers (in America) taken away from them. As you might imagine, this just increased the anger and distrust between the Colonists and Royal Authority. Finally, with the Boston Tea Party (a protest against taxation without representation), the British landed many more troops, and those troops set out into the countryside to take control of stores of black powder, muskets, lead shot and cannon. It was one of these "Powder Alarms" which turned into the Lexington and Concord fights that started the War
Thanks and happy to helping
Answer: The challenges of immigration are, more often than not, negotiated in the context of the family (Carranza 2001). Therefore, research in family studies needs to encompass the family as a unit of analysis as well as the patterns of resistance that family members develop in order to bounce back in an unwelcoming environment.
Explanation: A purposive sample was chosen in order to provide some diversity to the range of the accounts regarding mother–daughter negotiation. The purposive sample provided richness along many dimensions such as socio-economic-political religious affiliations, migration paths, etc. The sample design was fairly complex involving two sets of participants. Each of the two sets included mothers and their daughters. Participants in these sets were interviewed individually.These two sets were: (i) The Mother–Adolescent
Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adolescent daughters between the ages of 15 and 17 years who were born in Canada or abroad; and (ii) The Mother–Adult Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adult daughters between the ages of 19 and 30 years who grew up in Canada or arrived before becoming an adolescent. Mothers and daughters in these two groups were interviewed individually because ‘in-depth interviews provided the possibility to learn to see the world from the eyes of the person being interviewed’ (Ely 1991, p. 58). These in-depth conversations allowed obtaining information about the participants’ individual perceptions regarding their positioning as they settled into Canadian context.
To learn more about racism and immigration refer:-
brainly.com/question/8308669?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
''Significantly, the incarceration program got underway despite a warning; in January 1942, a naval intelligence officer in Los Angeles reported that Japanese-Americans<span> were being perceived as a </span>threat <span>almost entirely “because of the physical characteristics of the people.” Fewer than 3 percent of them might be inclined ...''</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
How can Inaugural Addresses challenge Americans to shape personal goals and commitments to uphold their responsibilities as informed, actively engaged citizens of the United States?
Answer:
Citizens play an important role in the success or failure of a presidential administration. We say this because United States citizens have the civic obligation to participate in the decisions they want their legislators to take to solve community issues or problems affecting the American people.
US citizens need to commit themselves to actively participate in politics because the President, the members of the cabinet, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch can't do things alone, isolated, They need the participation and approval of the American people.
So as the US President took the Oath of Office to preserve and defend the US Constitution, citizens should also commit themselves to help the government in a "team effort."