1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING
Answer:
Explanation:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/08/how-technology-will-change-the-way-we-work/
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/negative-effects-of-technology
2 websites that may help!
They created a limited government because they were escaping an oppressive one. They had been under the rule of Great Britain, a basically unlimited government. They did not want to create the same thing to replace the one that they had known.
There were 55 original delegates and only 41 were there the day of the signing. Three delegates refused to sign because the did not consider the constitution to be a basis for a strong and stable government and wished to make changes before committing it to law.
