A golfer tees off without seeing his partner has stopped his cart in front of the Teebox with his cart his partner gets hit with
the ball losing his eye and wants to sue for negligence what should the descision be and the rationale
1 answer:
Answer:
If it wasn't intentional and also apologized for it then there can be another way of solving the eye problem
You might be interested in
Answer:
Platoon, two, squads, first lieutenant
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>yes!</u>
Explanation:
<u>Here's why- there are mostly minorities living in the poor neighborhoods</u>
The answer is the right of enforcement belongs to the state
Thxx man can I have brainliest too
I’m almost completely sure it B
