Answer:
wrong the answer is D
Explanation:
The principle of judicial review is not in the Constitution.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.
While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.
So, I go with A
Supreme Court Chief Justice
member of the military
Answer:a snake
Explanation:
she had the snake bit her on the body
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
