Answer:
The strategy Pedro tend to do isn't worth, because using rigid transformation to place on figure onto the other won't prove that those figures are similar, but it would prove if they are congruent.
Remember that similarity is about proportionality between dimensions of those figures, so it's not about congruence. That means the figures won't match when we place one onto the other.
To prove similarity, Pedro should divide each pair of corresponding coordinate, if all divisions give the same result, that means those figures are similar.
<h3>Therefore, Pedro is not right.</h3>
Since you provide no information about the median salary, i'm gonna use the national data, whcih is around $ 13,000 per year
Cost of education for 2 year = $30,000
Since he's still working in those 2 years, he'll earn = $ 26,000
Which means he just need to work for around half a year to cover the remaining $4,000 , so i think the answer is 2.5 years
hope this helps
So all the multiples of 3 are...
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18
and of those, the ones not divisible by 2 are...
3, 9, 15
Answer:
The probability would be 7/12
Step-by-step explanation:
Since making or missing a shot is a binary situation, we know that we can subtract the probability from 1 and get the opposite.
1 - 5/12 = 7/12
The answer would be D. It would be $42 in the end if you picked D.
