1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
borishaifa [10]
3 years ago
5

discuss the rule of law as a democratic principle which supports a democracy under the following headings its importance

Law
1 answer:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
4 0

I uploaded the answer to a file hosting. Here's link:

tinyurl.com/wpazsebu

You might be interested in
What is an executive agreement
ahrayia [7]

Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding

4 0
4 years ago
Gawain sa pagkatuto bilang 2 punan ng angkop na kasagutan ang talahanayan sa ibaba​
notsponge [240]

Answer:

E

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the most likely venue for the case of a builder in MD working on renovations for a tenent in NY then hires a contractor
lisov135 [29]
The builder is at fault, however if there is no legal document that he has signed to say that he would complete the work and help them, then he isn’t liable.
7 0
3 years ago
What steps does the constitution provide if there is persuasive evidence that the president of the united states has committed t
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

Impeachment proceedings start with the House of Representatives "impeaching" the accused member. The senate then performs a trial.

Result

D. The President can be impeached by the House and removed by the Senate

3 0
2 years ago
The supreme court case worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it
Blababa [14]

Answer:

The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.

Explanation:

In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose that Georgia enacts a law requiring the use of contoured rear-fender mudguards on trucks and trailers operating within i
    15·1 answer
  • What state court are courts of record ?
    14·1 answer
  • Prior to the 1970s, how often did voters have to register to vote?
    6·1 answer
  • Matt goes out to dinner at 6pm and has 5 beers (12 oz) with his dinner. He then goes out
    12·2 answers
  • What do an autocracy and an absolute monarchy have in common?
    5·2 answers
  • I need help please.
    10·1 answer
  • If you need points here
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the importance of the law. please like 10 points. please help.​
    15·2 answers
  • The "stand your ground" doctrine originated in which state?
    12·2 answers
  • Which action is part of the naturalization process?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!