Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
Answer:
The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:
a) Compensatory damages
b) Consequential damages
Explanation:
a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed. For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.
b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities. Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.
Answer:
I'm doing good. What about you?
Answer:
Online Cruelty takes places when a person uses digital tools such as mobile phones and internet to harass or upset someone, often repeatedly.
Such people behave thoughtlessly and cruelly.
It harms a person's mental well being and health.
It can encourage other people to carry out physical attack as cruelty threatens a persons physical integrity.
<u><em>The family members and friends of the target are likely to be affected by the behavioral changes in the target.</em></u>
Yes based on the intellectual property law and copyright in general.
