Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).
Explanation: :)
Answer:
yes i agree
Explantion:
probabyProbably hes too unfit to speak LOL
They had to have a vote of 9/13 meaning 9 out of the 13 states had to agree.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The judgment of the trial court is correct that plaintiffs cannot recover against Gary and Joan Doerhoff on the theory pursued.
WeltyTrafficStops.pdf
if you search this up, the first link might help.
