1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
8

if a cop proceeds to pull me over for going over the speed limit and ask “Sir, do you know how fast you were going”, do i then h

ave to considerately tell him the truth or can i reply with. “No sir, how fast was i going?”, because then he couldn’t use that against me in court. Is that somehow against the law?
Law
1 answer:
nirvana33 [79]3 years ago
6 0
I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding
You might be interested in
Write a sentence describing the POWERS (what they can do) of the Legislative Branch
madam [21]

The Legislative Branch, consisting of the Senate and House of Representatives, has the ability to makes all laws, declare war, regulate interstate and foreign commerce and control taxing and spending policies.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A group of pirates is caught after hijacking a ship in U.S. territorial waters. Describe the path the case would take as
Nat2105 [25]

This case will need to be tried at least in a federal and a transnational or international court. Moreover, this will involve both national and international jurisdictions.

In law, there are three main types of courts:

  • Constitutional courts.
  • Federal courts.
  • Transnational courts.

Each of these applies the jurisdiction of the same level. For example, a constitutional court will apply the constitutional laws and specific state laws.

In the case presented, two of these courts are required:

  • Federal court: This is necessary because the crime was perpetrated in the U.S. territory, and therefore criminals are judged under U.S. Federal law.
  • Transnational court: Considering the pirates might not be American, and therefore there are at least 2 countries involved, it is necessary to consider the case under international maritime laws.

Learn more about law in: brainly.com/question/6590381

3 0
2 years ago
When did campaign finance regulation begin in the United States?
MAXImum [283]

After the Federal Election Campaign Act was amended in 1974 to impose limitations on contributions from individuals, political parties, and PACs, campaign finance regulation was established in the United States.

<h3>Which of the following was a significant outcome of the Federal Election Campaign Act between 1971 and 1974?</h3>

In order to ensure better openness of funds made to federal campaigns, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 established federal law in the United States. To impose monetary restrictions on their contributions, it was later updated in 1974. In accordance with the legislation, the Federal Election Commission was also created.

<h3>The Federal Election Commission did what?</h3>

The Federal Election Commission is an independent regulatory organization entrusted with monitoring and upholding federal campaign finance laws (FEC).

To know more about campaign finance regulation visit:

brainly.com/question/29543360

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
What research will help prepare you before you apply for a job?
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

A. Informational interviews on the position and background research on the company

5 0
3 years ago
What type of law developed in England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges
soldier1979 [14.2K]

The common law was developed in early England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges.

<h3>What are common laws?</h3>
  • In law, common law is the body of law formed by judges and comparable quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being declared in written decisions.
  • It is also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law.
  • In early England, judges wrote down their rulings and transmitted them to other judges, which led to the development of common law.
  • The fact that "common law" emerges as precedent is its distinguishing feature.
  • In circumstances where the parties differ on the law, a common law court looks to previous precedential decisions of competent courts and synthesizes the principles of those previous cases as applicable to the current facts.
  • If a similar dispute has already been handled, the court is normally compelled to accept the logic employed in that case.

As the definition itself says, In early England, judges wrote down their rulings and transmitted them to other judges, which led to the development of common law.

Therefore, the common law was developed in early England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges.

Know more about common laws here:

brainly.com/question/493036

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The subject is Civics as you can see: Case A Decision Template You have chosen to complete the Case A Decision Template. Note –
    8·1 answer
  • You cannot be held liable for the actions of your agents if the agents are violating your instructions.A. TrueB. False
    9·2 answers
  • Overtime wages...
    8·2 answers
  • Can crimes truly be victimless?
    13·1 answer
  • 80% of all collisions involve driver shirts and within seconds of collision
    13·1 answer
  • Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will
    14·1 answer
  • An army general forces your family to let him and a few of his men stay in your house.
    6·2 answers
  • A demand for the elimination of the traditional divisions of power and labor between the
    13·2 answers
  • Give an easy explaination on everything involving categorical syllogisms
    5·1 answer
  • Are women more ethical than men in the workplace? What are the ethics underlying your decision? Support your answer with reason.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!