1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
8

if a cop proceeds to pull me over for going over the speed limit and ask “Sir, do you know how fast you were going”, do i then h

ave to considerately tell him the truth or can i reply with. “No sir, how fast was i going?”, because then he couldn’t use that against me in court. Is that somehow against the law?
Law
1 answer:
nirvana33 [79]3 years ago
6 0
I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding
You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a victim's right?
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

Unlimited Victim’s Rights.

<h3><em>I hope this helped at all, sorry if it's incorrect.</em></h3>

4 0
2 years ago
Prescription medicines can impair a driver's judgement and slow reaction times.
-BARSIC- [3]
Prescription medicines can impair a drivers reaction so true
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP IM STRUGGLING AND I NEED TO KNOW
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

yes it is the government can write a letter to the editor

Explanation:

this is because there is a law that says that if someone online says something about the presedit the presidit can not do anything because i belive it is the right to speech or say something you do not like about him or her

3 0
3 years ago
What are the legal limits for public assemblies in the usa
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Not sure how many you are looking for but one is gatherings near schools which can be prohibited.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement summarizes the use of physiological expert testimony in court proceedings?
matrenka [14]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

This person that is called on to testify during a trial must have the knowledge or skills in the field that is relevant to the case.  A psychologist may be asked to serve as a consultant to an attorney or to a testifying psychologist.  This can be used to determine if someone is being truthful or if they are being deceitful.  They can be appointed by the court and they can sort through claims that are conflicting or if a conclusion cannot be reached. He is there to express his opinion based on his knowledge and education.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • One of the governor's responsibilities is to oversee the formulation of the state recommendations each year. After this is submi
    11·1 answer
  • One positive outcome of gangs in prison is .
    7·2 answers
  • Discuss FOUR (4) disadvantages of trade credit to the<br> buyer
    11·1 answer
  • What is the voluntary trade?​
    9·2 answers
  • The common law of Europe in the dark ages was developed by custom and usage,
    12·1 answer
  • Describe en que hechos de Nuestra Realidad Nacional Percibes Políticas económicas neoliberales?
    7·1 answer
  • What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
    10·1 answer
  • When you pass behind The wheel and got your license how Many days you have To wait To start driving
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of physical evidence might disqualify a suspect as the culprit?
    11·2 answers
  • Alfred is a defense attorney. He is trying to prepare a strong case for his client, Jeffrey, who has been accused of several cri
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!