1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
8

if a cop proceeds to pull me over for going over the speed limit and ask “Sir, do you know how fast you were going”, do i then h

ave to considerately tell him the truth or can i reply with. “No sir, how fast was i going?”, because then he couldn’t use that against me in court. Is that somehow against the law?
Law
1 answer:
nirvana33 [79]3 years ago
6 0
I would reply with “no sir how fast was I going” so that it can not be used against you in court you have to remember anything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law in court you would want to ask for what proof he has that you were speeding
You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT considered circumstantial evidence?
OverLord2011 [107]
Eye witness reports
7 0
3 years ago
What are the elements of a crime?
lys-0071 [83]

Answer:

1) Legality (must be a law) ...

2) Actus reus (Human conduct) ...

3) Causation (human conduct must cause harm) ...

4) Harm (to some other/thing) ...

5) Concurrence (State of Mind and Human Conduct) ...

6) Mens Rea (State of Mind; "guilty mind") ...

7) Punishment.

Explanation:

PLZ brainliest:)

6 0
2 years ago
f two people of different ethnic backgrounds were guilty of the same crime, but only one of them were accused and tried, this wo
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

It would be a violation of the due process and the equal protection under the law.

Explanation:

The fourteenth amendement is based on the conventional interpretation that "justice is blind" and that it should be administered without the implications of race, gender, religious beliefs or ethnicity.

3 0
3 years ago
The United States often achieves its foreign policy goals by:
atroni [7]
C trust me ;) !!!! 196383
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think judges should be allowed to set whatever punishments they want for individuals that have broken the law? Why or why
igomit [66]

Answer: No they should not be allowed

Explanation:

Judges can easily be biased to the situation and set a punishment that could unfair/wrong.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In a few sentences, explain what the Bee Gees’ song, “Staying Alive,” has to do with CPR. be origanal
    11·1 answer
  • Liquidity is something of value that you own. True O False​
    10·2 answers
  • If you notice clear fluid leaking from your
    5·1 answer
  • Why are drugs bad if they make people happy?
    9·2 answers
  • العمومية والتجريد والإلزام من الصفات المشتركة بين القواعد القانونية
    14·1 answer
  • What rights are included in the Miranda warning?
    8·1 answer
  • Just wish me a wish..........................
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following are rules designed to maintain a common order
    15·2 answers
  • To evaluate the effects of federalism, read the excerpt from the government archives.
    13·1 answer
  • What is NOT a way to lower your risk of drowsy driving?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!