Answer:
limited government I think
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Activities that give rise to <u> strict liability </u>are maintaining a dangerous animal, engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity, and manufacturing or distributing a defective product
Explanation:
Strict liability can be defined as the doctrine that makes a person liable even if the person did not act with fault or negligence
<u>This Liability imposes legal responsibility for injuries and damages even if the defendant who was found liable is without fault</u>
<u></u>
Activities that give rise to <u> strict liability </u>are maintaining a dangerous animal, engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity, and manufacturing or distributing a defective product.
<u>Selling Alcohol to a minor,having sex with a minor are few example of Strict Liability</u>
