1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
11

I was lead to believe that Democracy was rule by the majority, that members of parliament were there to represent the wishes of

the majority of their continuants, whether they had actually voted for them or not, regardless of what there views were on any subject. Is this not true any more
Law
1 answer:
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the same ammount of the persons beleiev in democrats can vote

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Because courts of law and equity have merged, the principles of equity are no longer applied. Group of answer choices True False
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

equity is still applied in the law

3 0
2 years ago
Tenants rights are within the purview of state and federal law. <br><br> a. False<br> b. True
elixir [45]

Answer: true

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following references the clause of the U.S. Constitution that provides that, "Full Faith and Credit shall be given
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

The following clause states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state"

a. The Full Faith and Credit Clause

Explanation:

  • The option a is correct as the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution states that each state should give full faith and credit to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of any other state in the United State of America.
  • The option b is incorrect as The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides safeguard against the discrimination for the people of a state in other state.
  • The option c is incorrect as this clause is about commerce matters so it is irrelevant here.
  • The option d is incorrect as this clause is related to the agreement between the parties so it is also irrelevant here.
  • The option e is also incorrect as the this bill is about the rights of the public and many more so it is also irrelevant in the given situation.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There are four basic classifications of privacy rights: Unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another; Using another pers
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

i think it should be against the law to sell a gram for more than 10 dollars

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Each of the following is a category of tort law except: Select one: a. Invasion of privacy. b. Strict Liability Tort. c. Neglige
Nata [24]

Answer:

a. Invasion of privacy.

Explanation:

Tort law decides if an individual ought to be considered legitimately responsible for a physical issue against another, just as what sort of remuneration the harmed party is qualified for.

There are three main categories: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • During training as Special Agents, trainees _____.
    9·1 answer
  • How has the court generally ruled when applying the 8th Amendment to the death penalty?​
    14·1 answer
  • Hi I'm a stalker who want to be stalked<br> ↑
    12·1 answer
  • What do park rangers go?
    6·2 answers
  • How does international law impact on Australian law and how is international incorporated in Australian law?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help
    5·1 answer
  • What are ways that forgiveness is present or not present in the US criminal justice system?
    8·1 answer
  • A proposal is also known as
    9·1 answer
  • What system did merchants in the early centuries use to make commercial
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me???
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!