Answer: Its A
Explanation: gob bless :P mark brainliest if can
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Answer:
I would say C. They give loans, but they don't receive loans. They do accept deposits, transfer money, and pay interest on some accounts . So I would go with C.
Explanation:
Answer:
The primary purpose of the tennis court oath was? To establish the national assembly.
Explanation:
Have a wonderful Merry Christmas and New Years.
Answer:
No proper accommodation to complete a job, Harassment, Being viewed as "Exotic," and a Wage gap.