Answer: A monarch system would have someone in charge or control of the government or state for a lifetime
Explanation:
A monarch system would have someone in charge or control of the government or state for a lifetime. In most scenario it's usually a royalty kind of government, where you a king or queen ruling until they are dead or removed through force or abduction from the throne or power. In these form of government, the ruler has the final say in every decision, there is usually ruthlessness in leadership and accountability is usually not a thing for them as those who request such might sometimes be killed.
Answer:
You can argue both ways, but here are a few reasons for each:
Benefit:
- Introduced foreign crops and animals that hadn't been previously existing
- Sparked an economy and trading routes between Europe and the Americas
- Because of the introduction of cash crops to the Americans, the American agricultural industry was becoming a big part of the economy
Became a detriment:
- Alongside the crops and animals being brought over, many diseases traveled and made their way into America, killing a generous amount of people
- Malaria was one of the major diseases brought over
- The Colombian Exchange was also bringing settlers into the Americas which pushed out the preexisting Native settlers; this led to many major conflicts down the road
<u>Cooperative federalism</u> is evidenced when national officials fund a project that is actually implemented by State governments.
<h3>What is federalism?</h3>
Federalism is a form of government in whereby the same territory is governed by two levels of government. By extension, federalism is a system of governance whereby power is being shared between the central and the component states.
Therefore, the Cooperative federalism is an instance of national funding of project(s) by the state.
learn more about federalism: brainly.com/question/985210
#SPJ1
