The answer is B.
"A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories. Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously, a scientific hypothesis is not the same as a scientific theory. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research, in a process beginning with an educated guess or thought."
"A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true."
Explanation:
Tourism has become one of the main income sources for many developing countries like Nepal. Nepal has great potential to become a top destination for tourists as the nation is famous for its snowcapped mountains, abundant flora and fauna, exciting trekking routes and rich cultural and religious diversity.
Because small business actually do more and got more stuff going on
Answer:
B) No, because she can get similar hammers elsewhere.
Explanation:
When someone sues for specific performance he/she is asking the court to order the defendant to complete performance the contract. They are not suing to recover any damages that may have resulted from the breaching of the contract.
In this case, Nicole would have probably been able to sue Tyler for some type of compensatory damages, but since the hammers are such a common good, it would be very difficult for her to obtain an specific performance order.
Answer:
If we made the assumption that both countries had a per capita of $15,000 in 1960, country A, which entered an era of political stability, and applied liberal reforms, growing at a rate of 5%, would double its GDP per capita by 1975, reaching a GDP per capita of $31,183.92.
On the contrary, country B, which continued to grow by 1% per year, would only double its GDP per capita by 2030, reaching a figure of $30,101.45.
Therefore, it would take 55 years more for country B to double its per capita GDP level compared to country A.
