1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
9

Two investment advisers are comparing performance. One averaged a 19% return and the other a 16% return. However, the beta for t

he first adviser was 1.5, while that of the second was 1.
Required:
a. If the T-bill rate was 6% and the market return during the period was 14%, which adviser would be the superior stock selector.
b. Can you tell which adviser was a better selector of individual stocks (aside from the issue of general movements in the market)?
c. What if the T-bill rate were 3% and the market return 15%?
Business
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Adviser B is the superior stock selector.

Explanation:

For the comparision between the two investment advisers, the Jenson's Alpha will be utilized.

Jenson's Alpha:

= Portfolio Actual Return - CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio Return)

T Bill Rate(Risk free rate) = 6%

Market return(E(Em) = 14%

Beta of Investment Adviser A = 1.5

Beta of Investment Adviser B = 1

For Adviser A:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 6 + 1.5 (14-6)

= 6 + 12

= 18%

Actual Return = 19%

Jenson's Alpha = 19% - 18% = 1%

For Adviser B:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 6 + 1(14-6) = 6 + 1(8) = 14%

Actual Return = 16%

Jenson's Alpha = 16% - 14% = 2%

Adviser B is a better selector because he has a larger alpha of 2% compared to Adviser A who has 1%.

T Bill Rate(Risk free rate) = 3%

Market return(E(Rm) = 15%

Beta of Investment Adviser A = 1.5

Beta of Investment Adviser B = 1

For Adviser A:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 3 + 1.5 (15-3)

= 3 + 18

= 21%

Actual Return = 19%

Jenson's Alpha = 19% - 21% = -2%

For Adviser B:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 3 + 1(15-3) = 3 + 1(12) = 15%

Actual Return = 16%

Jenson's Alpha = 16% - 15% = 1%

Given the changes, Adviser B is still the better selector because he has a larger alpha of 1% compared to Adviser A who has -2%.

You might be interested in
A firm must choose among three alternative ways to compensate its salaried employees. It can pay them at the end of each week, a
Murrr4er [49]
I believe the answer is B
6 0
3 years ago
A fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The 1st is a stock fund, the 2nd is a long-term government and corporate bond
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Expected return is: 7.37% and the Standard deviation is: 24.96%

Explanation:

Correlation between fund S&B=0,0667

Standard Deviation of Fund S=41%

Standard Deviation of Fund(B)=30%

E(R) of Stock Fund S=12%

E(R) of Stock Fund B=5%

Covariance between the funds = Standard Deviation of Fund(B) × Standard Deviation of Fund S × correlation between these funds

Cov = 0.41 × 0.30 × 0.0667 = 0.008204

Now minimum variance portfolio is found by applying:

W min(S)=(SDB)^2-Cov(B,S) / ((SDS)^2+(SDB)^2-2Cov(B,S)

W min(S) = 0.338431

W min(B) = 1-0.338431=0.661569

1) E(r)min= 0.338431 × 12% + 0.661569 × 5% = 7.37%

2) Standard Deviation:

SD Min = (Ws^2XSDs^2+Wb^2XSDb^2+2XWsWb*Cov(s,B)^1/2

SDmin=(0.338431^2 × 0.41^2 + 0.661569^2 ×   0.3^2   + 2 × 0.338431 × 0.661569 × 0.008204)^1/2

SDmin=24.96%

8 0
3 years ago
The Gorman Group is a financial planning services firm owned and operated by Nicole Gorman. As of October 31, 2019, the end of t
solong [7]

Answer:

The Gorman Group

1. The Gorman Group

Income Statement

For the Year Ended October 31, 2019

Service Fees                                                     $421,010

Rent Revenue                                                        4,450

Total Revenue                                                $425,460

Salaries Expense                           $301,820

Depreciation Expense—Equipment 16,400

Rent Expense                                    13,700

Supplies Expense                               9,710

Utilities Expense                                8,780

Depreciation Expense—Buildings    5,850

Repairs Expense                               4,840

Insurance Expense                          2,650

Miscellaneous Expense                   4,520  $368,270

Net Income                                                      $57,190

The Gorman Group

Statement of Owner's Equity

For the Year Ended October 31, 2019

Nicole Gorman, Capital                   $378,780

Net Income                                           57,190

Nicole Gorman, Drawing                   (22,200)

Owner's Equity, October 31, 2019  $413,770

2. Closing Journal Entries at October 31, 2019:

Debit Income Summary $368,270

Credit:

Salaries Expense                           $301,820

Depreciation Expense—Equipment 16,400

Rent Expense                                    13,700

Supplies Expense                               9,710

Utilities Expense                                8,780

Depreciation Expense—Buildings    5,850

Repairs Expense                               4,840

Insurance Expense                          2,650

Miscellaneous Expense                   4,520

To close the expenses accounts to the income summary.

Debit:

Service Fees   $421,010

Rent Revenue    4,450

Credit Income Summary $425,460

To close the revenue accounts to the income summary.

3. The amount of net income would have been $137,200.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

The Gorman Group

End-of-Period Spreadsheet

For the Year Ended October 31, 2019

Adjusted Trial Balance

Account Title                                           Dr.               Cr.

Cash                                                    $13,880

Accounts Receivable                           30,210

Supplies                                                 4,720

Prepaid Insurance                               10,200

Land                                                    89,000

Buildings                                           319,000

Accumulated Depreciation-Buildings             $103,900

Equipment                                       230,000

Accumulated Depreciation-Equipment            135,300

Accounts Payable                                               29,520

Salaries Payable                                                    2,930

Unearned Rent                                                       1,330

Nicole Gorman, Capital                                     378,780

Nicole Gorman, Drawing                  22,200

Service Fees                                                      421,010

Rent Revenue                                                      4,450

Salaries Expense                             301,820

Depreciation Expense—Equipment 16,400

Rent Expense                                    13,700

Supplies Expense                               9,710

Utilities Expense                                8,780

Depreciation Expense—Buildings    5,850

Repairs Expense                               4,840

Insurance Expense                          2,650

Miscellaneous Expense                   4,520

Totals                                          1,077,220 1,077,220

Amount of Nicole Gorman's Capital increased by $115,000:

Net income would have been $137,200 instead of $57,190.

Closing Nicole Gorman, Capital = $515,980

Less Drawings               22,200

        Beginning capital 378,780    400,980

Increase in capital =                       $115,000

4 0
2 years ago
Minstrel Manufacturing uses a job order costing system. During one month, Minstrel purchased $206,000 of raw materials on credit
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

$14,000 under applied

Explanation:

Given that

Material production = $203,000

Application rate = 150%

The computation of amount of overhead is shown below:-

Overhead = Material production × Application rate

= $203,000 - ($126,000 × 1.5)

= $203,000 - $189,000

= $14,000 under applied

Therefore, for computing the overhead we simply multiply the material production with application rate percentage.

3 0
3 years ago
Which sociological perspective would view sports as a form of big business in which profits are more important than the health a
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer: B. CONFLICT PERSPECTIVE

Explanation:

CONFLICT PERSPECTIVE

This theory which was opined by Karl Marx suggests that society keeps competing for limited resources and as such is in continuous conflict.

According to this theory, individuals and groups within society work to maximize their benefits and hold onto wealth by any means necessary including the disregard of the health and safety of athletes in this scenario.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Flapjack Corporation had 7,680 actual direct labor hours at an actual rate of $12.45 per hour. Original production had been budg
    11·1 answer
  • Which 4 reasons to open an account would benefit you, personally, the most?
    7·1 answer
  • Managers are important members of the organization. Within an organization, there are managers at four levels: top, middle, firs
    15·1 answer
  • Derrick delivers messages on his bike all over the busy, hilly streets of downtown san francisco. he is engaging in which type o
    14·1 answer
  • The Accounts Receivable account has a beginning balance of $10,000 and the company provides services of $50,000 on account durin
    14·1 answer
  • Whats being productive
    7·2 answers
  • Think through the SWOT analysis and think about your personal product offering. Focus on the specific value you would bring to t
    9·1 answer
  • Firm ML, a non-corporate taxpayer, exchanged residential rental property plus $15,000 cash for 20 acres of investment land with
    7·1 answer
  • Supercircuits is a decentralized company and has a required opportunity cost of capital of 15%. The home computer division, whos
    7·1 answer
  • You see the message "secret formula" on an online advertisement for a weight-reduction product. How should you interpret such a
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!