1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garik1379 [7]
3 years ago
5

A democratic society in which citizens do not fulfill their responsibility to vote in state, local, and national elections, woul

d be a society unable to do which of the following selections?
History
2 answers:
aalyn [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

could you provides the selections please?

adell [148]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

You didn’t put any options but...

Explanation:

If you did, I would say that this is no longer a democratic society. If you can’t vote, it’s either a dictatorship or anarchy. BUT if you needed an answer I would say that it couldn’t...

1) elect a president

2) Make fair laws

The reason for society is that citizens get safety and security and leaders get the power to make laws in which citizens follow, creating a fair balance. Now, in a society where fair laws can not be put in place, how can leaders keep citizens safe and secure? How can they hold up their end of the bargain? They can’t. This isn’t even a society.

You might be interested in
Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the Cherokee were a sovereign
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer: Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court that the Cherokee was a sovereign nation, the forcible removal of the Cherokee was carried out by the state of Georgia. The Cherokee however argued that they had negotiated treaties with the United State federal government that had granted them the rights to these lands. The Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee were a separate, independent nation with a right to retain their lands. President Jackson did not however enforce the court decision, and the state of Georgia continue the policy of removing them from their own land.

4 0
3 years ago
What were some of the pros or positives of colonization & some of the cons or negatives of colonization.
Stels [109]

Answer:

explanation down

Explanation:

pros they were able to colinalize and were able to do things more easily together the cons were there would be conflict and they would get raided sometimes

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Items that explain why Grant wanted to capture Vicksburg.
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

Select the items that explain why Grant wanted to capture Vicksburg. It would cut the South off from supplies from Louisiana and Texas. It would give the North control of the Mississippi. How did Grant capture Vicksburg in May 1863?

7 0
3 years ago
• Botticelli
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

they were all famous artists

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The amount of grain that a shape will hold is called the surface area. True or False
Maurinko [17]
False. That would be the area. Also, please change the subject from History to Mathematics. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is an example of white resistance to desegregation? (808-809) Question 9 options:
    10·1 answer
  • I don't understand History at all. help please!!
    10·1 answer
  • which early american culture was one source of inspiration for the structure of present-day United States politics
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the klu klux klan important to American history
    12·1 answer
  • Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citize
    6·1 answer
  • This is two questions,giving more points
    8·2 answers
  • Why were kibbutzim such as the one shown here important to the newly formed nation of Israel? (1 point)
    6·1 answer
  • How are officials elected or appointed?<br>hpw do people exercise power?​
    5·1 answer
  • One way the government promoted assimilation in the 1800s was to forbid Indigenous children
    11·1 answer
  • To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!