That no matter who it is, the United States is willing to help those countries have equal rights for everybody
Answer:
The current Republican administration and the Republican-controlled Congress seem to support less government expenditure. Spokesman Ryan, as a rule, has shown a bias for fiscal discipline. President Trump went on a campaign that pledged government expenditure to save employment but did not generally deliver, and his position against the ACA showed a desire to reduce state action. It is also clear from the income cap that the state will get less revenue and that its expenditure and capacity to act will be lowered. Recent occurrences in Puerto Rico and the absence of complete assistance for the island represent less public action. <u>I think that this pattern will persist at least until the next Congressional elections.</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
Decline food production: Higher prices
Famine: Malnutrition, starvation, and death
Heavy rains and flooding: Destruction of crops
Cooler summer temperatures: Shorter growing season
Answer:
The English colonies were shaped by the search for a labor force in many ways. One way was through the use of freemen or yeomen. These were people who were not indentured servants and were free to work for themselves. Another way was through the use of indentured servitude. This was a system where people would work for a certain period of time, usually four to seven years, in exchange for their passage to America. After they had fulfilled their contract, they were free to work for themselves. The last way was through the use of slavery. This was a system where people were forcibly brought to America and forced to work for their entire lives.
Explanation:
Answer: The Democratic Republican Party and the Federalists
Explanation:
The Federalists wanted a strong federal government whereas the DRP defended states' rights.
They disagreed on central banking, Hamilton(Federalist) wanted to have a federal entity to control the issuing of money(a central bank) which Jefferson(DRP) strongly opposed since the power of the bankers to control monetary creation would endanger individual liberties.
They disagreed on their interpretation of the Constitution, someone like Marshall (Chief Justice of the USA, 1800-1835) defended a loose interpretation of the Constitution whereas Jefferson stood for a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
