Americans have built permanent structures while the Europeans have not is the most accurate comparison of Americans and Europeans in the area of Oklahoma.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Before the Europeans landed in Oklahoma, the native tribes of America were living all over the land. Quapaw and Osaga had spoken similar language in the nation's eastern region.
The Quapaw and the Wicha were living in the southern part of the state and they had similar traditions and culture. More than one century later, Robert de La Salle, a French adventurer, landed. He stated the territory for the French, who set up fur trade points along the region's waterways.
During Reconstruction, groups such as the Ku Klux Klan used violence to prevent freed people from voting. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has come to your help.
Saving American Lives and reducing cost of rebuilding Japan.
Explanation:
Truly the US wanted an excuse to use a new weapon. many were against the use of the atomic bomb in the wat, but the argument that decided the fate was one of calculation in time, money, and lives.
With the Atomic weapons used, the war would be ended several years earlier rather than completely invading Japan where the most hostile front in the pacific would have been (the "hornets' nest" so to speak). This would have also accomplished saving potentially hundreds of thousands or even millions of US service members lives.
Lastly the cost, the US held no intention of defeating Japan and then leaving the nation to do what it pleased. So if they were to occupy and begin a war of "winning hearts" it made it much easier to do when the US only had to rebuild two cities as opposed to the billions of dollars it would take perhaps trillions; to rebuild the nation entirely.
