Answer:
Microsoft was doing good till 1990's because there was no competition at that time and they were the only operation system known, but when internet market was getting other competitors Microsoft's risk increased they couldn't compete with them.
Explanation:
Systematic beta reflects the risk which is present in the market and difficult to avoid.
- Microsoft was doing great when and the reason they got on top was because there was no competitor so they weren't at risk.
- <em>But</em> since the technological industry is enhancing Microsoft didn't adapt to change and continued with their old strategy which led them at this condition as there risk is increasing they are highly volatile to the market.
The aspect that does not have to be known by the programmers would be How the methods are implemented.
<h3>What is a computer program?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the sets of commands that are used to carry out special and specific functions on computers.
The both of them would not need to knwo how the methods are implemented.
Read more on computer programs here:
brainly.com/question/1538272
#SPJ1
Answer: 666.13 units
Explanation:
Given that,
Production Per day (P) = 295
Usage rate of sub-components (D) = 12,700 per year (250 working days)
Holding cost (H) = $2 per item
Ordering costs (S) = $29 per order
= $50.8
= 1 - 0.1722
= 0.8278
= 0.83
= 666.13 units
Answer:
Increase in operating income $ 3,600 <u> </u>
Explanation:
The impact on operating income will be done using incremental analysis.
Here we consider only the impact of the proposed change on the income
This is done as follows: $
Contribution before (4,000 × $(500- 320) = 720,000
Contribution after - (98%× 4,000)× (525-320) = <u> 803,600</u>
Increase in contribution 83600
Increase in Fixed expenses <u> ( 80,000)</u>
Increase in operating income <u> 3,600</u>