Answer:
Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia
Explanation:
The four main conditions of an experimental functional analysis are attention, escape, demand, and alone: False.
<h3>What is an
experimental functional analysis?</h3>
An experimental functional analysis can be defined as the form of functional behavior assessment through which a health or clinical psychologist directly test antecedents and consequences, for a client's problem in order to determine function.
Additionally, an experimental functional analysis uses a single subject research design when analyzing a client's behavior problem.
<h3>The main conditions of an
experimental functional analysis.</h3>
In Psychology, there are three (3) main conditions of an experimental functional analysis and these include the following:
- Attention positive reinforcement.
- Tangible positive reinforcement.
- Demand/negative reinforcement.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that there are only three (3) main conditions of an experimental functional analysis but not four as stated.
Read more on functional analysis here: brainly.com/question/4158004
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
The four main conditions of an experimental functional analysis are? attention, escape, demand, and alone. True or False?
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
Definition: To carry from one place to another by means of a vehicle.
Importance: It manages traffic flows, and also enables the undisturbed and steady movement from one place to another.
Explanation:
Answer: They Depended on a system of canals that they were building to bring the water fron rivers into their fields
Explanation:
